Fool Me Once Shame on You;

Fool Me Twice Shame on Me

 

Comparing the 1986 and 2007 Political Promises

 On Immigration Enforcement

 

Then v. Now

 

FOOLED ONCE                    DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN

 

Enforcement Promises

Simpson-Mazzoli Debate (1986)

Bush-McCain-Kennedy (2007)

Then as now, the bill promises to have tough employer sanctions

“The bill reported by the conference—and I assure my colleagues that this is correct—contained the same essential elements that had passed this body, this Senate in years past ….Those essential things are employer sanctions, meaning penalties against those who knowingly hire illegal undocumented persons…”

(Senator Simpson)[1]

 

“It has universal application of employer sanctions.  You sent us to conference to keep it, and we kept it. Finally, it has criminal sanctions.  You sent us to conference to keep it, and we kept it…With regard to employer sanctions, the conference agreement remains essentially the program previously approved by the House.  Criminal penalties for pattern or practice violations are preserved.”  (Rep. Mazzoli)[2]

    

“In my judgment, employer sanctions are essential if this country is to regain control of its borders.  Indeed, it is our sovereign responsibility to do so…” (Rep. Rodino)[3]

“With only four workplace enforcement actions in 2005, a tough new policy must enforce realistic sanctions to deter illegal hiring.” (Senator Specter)[4]

 

“Not only will this legislation finally accomplish the extraordinary goal of securing our borders, but it will also greatly improve interior enforcement and put employers on notice that the practice of hiring illegal workers simply will not be tolerated.” (Senator McCain)[5]

 

“This bill also addresses other problems with the 1986 reform… Businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens will be punished.” (President Bush)[6]


 

Then as now, the promises to have a working employee verification system

“The bill reported by the conference …[contained]… a secure system to determine worker eligibility in the United States.” (Sen. Simpson)[7]

 

“Universal and mandatory verification of documents is similarly still required.” (Rep. Mazzoli)[8]

“As you know, the bill starts with triggers on border enforcement ….and get an electronic verification system up that is operational and can start to provide to the employers an ability to verify who is an American citizen.” (Secretary Chertoff)[9]

 

“The result is legislation that puts border security first…[and] sets up a mandatory system for verifying employment eligibility…” (President Bush)[10]

 

"The employee verification system is really the complement to the border. You can try to prevent people coming in, but there is a magnet of employment. Resourceful people can find ways to get here. So if you can shut off that magnet of illegal employment, that complements the work you are doing at the border. A lot of businesses just want to have a legal way of doing things . . . and the employer now has a way to make the law work." (Senator Kyl)[11]

Then as now, the bill promises to provide secure borders

“It’s high time we regained control of our borders & [Senator Alan Simpson’s] bill will do this.” (President Reagan)[12]

                                             

“I believe we should vote to approve this conference report and get a bill to the President.  Our country desperately needs to regain control over its borders.  This bill will help us start that process and will provide the immediate relief on the border that we need.” (Rep Moorhead)[13]

 

 

“This bill focuses on border security. … Certain aspects of the [bill] don’t come into being until certain border measures are taken.” (President Bush)[14]

 

“First and foremost among our priorities was to ensure this bill included strong border security and enforcement provisions.  We need to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security has the resources it needs to secure our borders to the greatest extent possible." (Senator McCain)[15]


 

Then as now, the bill promises to double resources

“Under this conference committee report the resources of the border patrol will double together with assuring additional sums for the INS to perform their functions.” (Senator Simpson)[16]

 

"...one of the items that has not been mentioned is the debate today is we are doubling up the border patrol.  This immigration bill says we are going to get tough with immigration laws; we are going to expedite our exclusionary process; we are going to take care of the backlog; and we are going to blunt the economic magnets that draw these people into the country illegally." (Rep Shaw)[17]

“My Administration is determined to learn from the mistakes of the past decades. And that is why we are now committing more resources than ever before to border security, doubling the number of Border Patrol agents…” (President Bush)[18]

 

“We will have more than doubled the Border Patrol in a relatively quick period of time. We believe the more manpower is on the border, the more likely it is we will be able to enforce the border, like the American people expect us to do.” (President Bush)[19]

 

Then as now, the bill promises that this bill is going to work and take care of the immigration issue once and for all. 

“I am glad to see that we are on the brink of resolving this important issue in a constructive and definitive way…

In my view it is a good bill.  We should all support it and be glad that this long controversy has been finally put to rest.” (Rep. Seiberling)[20]

 

“No legislation before this Congress is of higher priority.  I am hopeful that enactment of this legislation will help us regain control of our borders and avoid a future repressive public reaction that will fail to distinguish lawful immigrants and refugees from illegal aliens. . … Mr. Speaker, I believe the conference report before us today contains the essential provisions needed for comprehensive immigration reform.” (Rep. Fish)[21]

 

“I know that this was a troubling issue to many of our colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but I can assure you that it is our intention and the conferees intention that legalization be a “one

-time” only event …” (Rep Rodino)[22]

“If you want to kill the bill, if you don't want to do what's right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it. You can use it to frighten people. Or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all”. (President Bush)[23]


Then as now, this bill claims that it has to be comprehensive or it won’t work

“The conference report before us contains the fundamental twin components of immigration reform – that is, employer sanctions and legalization.  Those interlinked components have been in every Judiciary Committee bill since 1975 and any bill that does not contain both of these elements cannot be called immigration reform.”

(Rep. Rodino)[24]

 

“If you're serious about reform, it makes sense to support comprehensive legislation that addresses all aspects of the problem. You cannot solve the problem unless we address all aspects of the problem at the same time.” (President Bush)[25]

Then as now, defenders of the bill threaten that the only alternative to a “comprehensive” bill  is deportation

“But let me share with you that the alternative to legalization is to go hunt for them…The alternative to legalization is deportation.  And the only way you are going to find the persons to deport is to go find them.” (Senator Simpson)[26]

 

“I have the impression that perhaps for some people, the only thing that would not be amnesty is mass deportation.” (Secretary Gutierrez)[27]

Then as now, supporters of the bill say that this bill finally brings people out of the shadows

“We will be bringing people out of a shadow economy, people will be paying taxes, people will be coming out in the sunshine, there will not be the abuse of workers, employers will not be able to provide poor-quality jobs for people, they will not be able to oppress people, sanctions will keep a magnet from attracting these people here—all of those things we know…” (Rep Smith)[28]

 

"There are millions and millions of illegal aliens in this country that now will have an opportunity to start on the road toward citizenship.  They will have the opportunity to come out of the

 shadows…" (Rep Shaw)[29]

“We, as Americans, must decide whether we want to live in a society where there is a permanent underclass of 12 million people hidden from the law, often paid less than living wages, and disenfranchised from our culture, or we can embrace the spirit that has made America so great and bring people out of the shadows, give them an opportunity to live within the law and become responsible, contributing members of our society.” (Senator Martinez)[30]

 

Then as now, people who want to control the border are called nativists

“[Simpson-Mazzoli] is an undeserved slap at millions of Hispanic citizens.  In our zeal to control our borders, we should resist the temptation to break faith with the noble ideals of America’s immigrant heritage.  This measure fails that test, and it should not be enacted

 into law.” (Senator Kennedy)[31]

“But the real passion in this debate is not political, it is cultural -- a fear that American identity is being diluted by Latino migration.” (Michael Gerson)[32]

 

“Those who choose humanity over divisive rhetoric will be rewarded with a country that is stronger, more productive and more enduring as we forge ahead in this great experiment of democracy.” (Senator Martinez)[33]

 

“We are going to solve this problem. We're not going to run people down. We're not going to scapegoat people. We're going to tell the bigots to shut up, and we're going to get this right.” (Senator Graham)[34]

Then as now, supporters claim that this bill is the best we can do

“[Simpson-Mazzoli] will help us control the borders and at the same time doing justice and decency and equity to the people who are in this country illegally.  It is not a perfect bill, but it is the least imperfect bill that we will ever have before us…. As I have said before, those who are looking for a perfect immigration bill will not find it here, since there can be no perfect immigration bill.  This is, however, a good bill and the best we are likely to

 produce. ” (Rep. Mazzoli)[35]

 

"There has not been a perfect bill to come to this floor, but this bill certainly falls in the classification of making the best out of a bad situation…" (Rep Shaw)[36]

 

"This is a grand compromise.  This satisfies no one entirely, but I would suggest that it does violence to no one entirely.  It takes care of the legitimate

 needs that are recognized in this country." (Rep Lungren)[37]

 

"Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this historic conference agreement.  It’s not perfect.  God knows there are things in here that I wish weren’t…Reject this conference report, whatever its imperfections, and there’s no looking back.  We will have lost a historic opportunity.  Far-reaching and critically needed immigration reform will be by the boards." (Rep Conte)[38]

“Like any legislation, [McCain-Kennedy] is not perfect. And like many Senators, I believe the bill will need to be further improved along the way before it becomes law.” (President Bush)[39]

 

"From my perspective, it's not perfect, but it represents the best opportunity that we have, in a bipartisan way, to do something about this problem." (Senator Kyl)[40]

 

 [Illegal immigration] is a serious national security problem.  We need to act, my friends. And if someone else has a better idea, I’d love to have them pursue – give it to us.  That will get the support of enough people so that we can pass legislation.  This isn’t the bill that I would have written, but it does satisfy our national security challenges, which are severe and intense. And we cannot have 12 million people washing around America illegally, my friends.” (Senator McCain)[41]

 

 

 



[1] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 32409-32410.

[2] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31633-31634.

[3] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31631.

[4] Senator Arlen Specter. “Improved Border Security is Needed.” 17 July 2007. <http://specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Articles.Detail&Article_id=89&Month=7&Year=2006>

[5] Senator John McCain. “Statement on Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Reform Act of 2007.” 25 May 2007.

[6] President George W. Bush. “President’s Radio Address.” 8 June 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070608-8.html

[7] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 32409-32410.

[8] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31633-31634.

[9] Michael Chertoff, “Press Briefing on Immigration Reform.”  Office of the Press Secretary.  May 17, 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070517-12.html

[10] President George W. Bush. “President’s Radio Address.” 8 June 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070608-8.html

[11] Senator Jon Kyl, as quoted by Collin Levy. "The 'Amnesty' Canard: Senator Jon Kyl Talks About Efforts to Forge An Immigration Compromise." WSJ Opinion Journal. 9 June 2007. http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010190

[12] President Ronald Reagan and Douglas Brinkley, ed.  The Reagan Diaries.  New York: HarperCollins, 2007. (pp 445).

[13] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31638.

[14] President George W. Bush. CBS News Video, speech at the White House, June 1, 2007, <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/01/politics/main2876096.shtml>

[15] Senator John McCain. "Statement on the Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Reform Act of 2007." Press Release. 25 May 2007. <http://mccain.senate.gov/press_office/view_article.cfm?id=1088>

[16] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 32409-32410.

[17] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31639.

[18] President George W. Bush. “President’s Radio Address.” 8 June 2007. < http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070608-8.html>

[19] President George W. Bush. “Bush Delivers Remarks on Immigration Reform.” CQ Transcripts Wire. 29 May 2007. < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052901110.html>

[20] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31635.

[21] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31634.

[22] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31631.

[23] President George W. Bush. “Bush Delivers Remarks on Immigration Reform.” CQ Transcripts Wire. 29 May 2007. < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052901110.html>

[24] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31631.

[25] President George W. Bush. “Bush Delivers Remarks on Immigration Reform.” CQ Transcripts Wire. 29 May 2007. < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052901110.html>

[26] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 32409-32410.

[27] Joshi, Jitendra. “Bush’s Immigration Deal Faces Battle in Congress.” Yahoo News. 20 May 2007. < http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070520/ts_alt_afp/uscongressimmigration_070520202355>

[28] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31644.                                                                                                                                                                    

[29] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31639.    

[30] Senator Mel Martinez. “In Defense of Immigration Bill.” Orlando Sentinel. 3 June 2007. < http://martinez.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=InNews.View&ContentRecord_id=5414&CFID=1012467&CFTOKEN=61483539>

[31] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 32377.

[32] Gerson, Michael. “Letting Fear Rule.” Washington Post. 25 May 2007.

[33] Senator Mel Martinez. “In Defense of Immigration Bill.” Orlando Sentinel. 3 June 2007. < http://martinez.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=InNews.View&ContentRecord_id=5414&CFID=1012467&CFTOKEN=61483539>

[34]Gaynor, Michael J.  “Catastrophe! Peggy Noonan, Laura Ingraham Agree On Bush Immigration.”  The Post Chronicle.  June 11, 2007. http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_21285168.shtml

[35] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31633-31634.

[36]  House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31639.

[37] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31643.

[38] House and Senate Debate on the Conference Report. Congressional Record. 99th Congress., 2nd Session, 1986, 31644.

[39] President George W. Bush. “President’s Radio Address.” 8 June 2007. < http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070608-8.html>

[40] Senator Jon Kyl. “Immigration Breakthrough Could Pave the Way for Citizenship” CNN. 18 May 2007. <http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/17/senate.immigration/index.html>

[41] Senator John McCain. Transcript: Republican Primary Debate. CNN. 5 June 2007. <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0706/05/se.01.html>